News report
AMD Is Still Exploring Samsung Foundry Partnership as Memory Supply Tightens
AMD CEO Lisa Su says the company is still exploring Samsung foundry cooperation while leaning on Samsung and SK hynix for memory as AI demand strains supply.
On this page
AMD says Samsung talks still span both memory and foundry
AMD CEO Lisa Su said on October 7 that the company continues to explore partnership opportunities with Samsung Electronics across both memory and foundry manufacturing. The comments came during Su's visit to Seoul, where she had already met SK hynix executives and planned discussions with Samsung executives.
The foundry point is important but should not be overstated. AMD and Samsung have not announced that a future Ryzen, Radeon, EPYC or Instinct product will be fabricated by Samsung, nor have they disclosed a process node, product, wafer volume or production date for a foundry agreement. Su's comments confirm that the option remains under discussion, not that a manufacturing contract has been finalized.
The immediate pressure is memory supply for AI systems
Su described memory supply as tight and said AMD is working with customers to optimize memory footprints so that available supply can support more computing. She also said AMD relies heavily on the Korean supply chain and identified Samsung and SK hynix as important to the company's data-center ambitions.
That dependence is increasingly significant as AI accelerators require large amounts of high-bandwidth memory. Su encouraged memory suppliers to expand capacity quickly, while separate comments during the Seoul visit described AMD's planning horizon with suppliers as extending three to five years. Those statements are evidence of supply-chain planning pressure, not a guarantee of future memory availability or lower prices.
The talks build on AMD and Samsung's March AI-memory agreement
Samsung and AMD signed a memorandum of understanding on March 18 to expand cooperation on next-generation AI memory. Samsung said the agreement covers HBM4 supply for AMD Instinct MI455X GPUs and next-generation DDR5 solutions for AMD EPYC processors and the Helios platform.
Samsung's March announcement also framed its capabilities more broadly around memory, foundry and advanced packaging. The October comments therefore extend an already public strategic relationship rather than introducing AMD-Samsung cooperation from scratch. What is new is Su's confirmation that foundry opportunities remain actively under consideration while memory capacity is a pressing operational concern.
Why a broader manufacturing option could matter to AMD
AMD currently depends on external manufacturing and memory partners to turn its CPU, GPU and accelerator roadmaps into shipping systems. As data-center demand grows, access to advanced wafers, HBM and packaging can become as important to shipment volume as the processor design itself. Reuters reported on October 6 that AMD plans to increase chip supply substantially in 2027 and that Su was discussing additional production capacity with supply-chain partners.
A Samsung foundry relationship could, in principle, broaden AMD's manufacturing options. But that remains analysis rather than an announced production plan. The concrete evidence to watch next is whether AMD and Samsung disclose a specific process technology, product program, wafer commitment or production timetable. Until then, the confirmed story is continued exploration alongside deeper memory cooperation.
What this means for PC hardware buyers
There is no immediate consumer CPU or GPU change to act on. The discussions do not establish a new Ryzen or Radeon launch, a price change, or a switch away from an existing foundry. Their relevance is upstream: AMD is trying to secure the manufacturing and memory capacity needed for a larger future compute business.
For PC hardware markets, memory capacity is the nearer-term connection. AI infrastructure competes for advanced DRAM and manufacturing resources, but Su's comments do not by themselves predict DDR5 retail prices or availability. Those outcomes also depend on supplier capacity additions, product mix, inventories, yields and consumer demand.
Sources
Primary and technical sources
These sources support the reporting and analysis above. Current stories are updated when later evidence materially changes the facts.